Breakups occur and are an unavoidable truth. When couples go separate ways, what befalls the pets they share? Maine inhabitant, Jessica Sardina, indicted her ex looking for shared guardianship of their canine, Honey. The case made it right to Maine’s Supreme Court, gathering worldwide features and analysis from hound darlings around the globe.
A locale court decided for Sardina’s ex, Kelvin Liriano, expressing that since his name was on the appropriation papers, the pooch had a place with him. Sardina claimed, contending that she had a more grounded connection to the Boxer-Lab blend.
The Maine Supreme Court maintained the choice of its lower court, permitting Liriano to remain the sole proprietor of the dog.In the report, Chief Justice Leigh Saufley expressed, “What occurs with the canine when unmarried gatherings head out in their own direction – is that truly something we need made a decision in this state to invest their energy in?”
It took two weeks for the choice, which sees creatures as property. Sardina’s legal advisor, Gene Sullivan, gave a reaction to the decision.”On one finish of the range, we have care laws for youngsters,” Sullivan shared.
“On the other, we have property laws for property. In Maine, the time has come to change where along this range partner creatures have a place. I would contend nearer to the center, on the care side.
“It took two weeks for the decision, which views animals as property. Sardina’s lawyer, Gene Sullivan, issued a response to the decision.“On one end of the spectrum, we have custody laws for children,” Sullivan shared.
“On the other, we have property laws for property. In Maine, it is time to change where along this spectrum companion animals belong. I would argue closer to the middle, on the custody side.”
Pets are considered property in all 50 states, and only three states, Alaska, Illinois, and California – have specific laws that address pet custody when a marriage ends. There are no statutes in place for what happens to pets when unmarried couples part ways.